The Dalai Lama and Quantum Physics 3/6

Category : Randomness
The Dalai Lama and Quantum Physics 3/6by wpjljron.The Dalai Lama and Quantum Physics 3/6“Maybe knowledge is as fundamental, or even more fundamental than reality.” (A.Z.) The austrian quantum physicist Anton Zeilinger explains to the Dalai Lama …

“Maybe knowledge is as fundamental, or even more fundamental than reality.” (A.Z.) The austrian quantum physicist Anton Zeilinger explains to the Dalai Lama …

Author: 

Related Posts

23 Responses

  1. Wuxos313 October, 2013 at 11:27 am

    I wanna speak with these guys, i think i know the answer!!! That physicist looks so unintelligent asking same afer same…

  2. bisera bi15 September, 2013 at 10:21 am

    It resembles a meeting between the Ultimate and the Relative.

  3. bisera bi15 September, 2013 at 10:15 am

    Fundamentally it is all a concept. A mind’s concept.

  4. Narendra Katkar6 September, 2013 at 7:10 am

    Dear Colleagues,
    Please visit my page for the following:
    Consciousness Research in Medical Sciences
    My page: Google: ircfsnk
    Sincerely,
    Narendra Katkar, (Ph.D, Honorary), Founder-Ircfs: Neurophysicist:
    International Research Center for Fundamental Sciences (IRCFS)

  5. MrHammerkop31 August, 2013 at 6:47 pm

    From c. 04:00 on ( random v patterned, direct v indirect etc )
    If a few scattered leaves, visible to an observer, are floating on a pond of undulating water, itself invisible, the leaves are perceived to bob randomly up and down. From this the observer cannot infer the presence of waves.
    If the pond of invisible water is then covered in visible leaves, the presence of waves becomes apparent, even though invisible; hence the presence of waves emerges in the behaviour of enough leaves. ????

  6. theOBrien r12 July, 2013 at 9:56 pm

    YESS i was thinking that the whole time. Einstein said if you cant explain something simply, you don’t understand it well enough.

  7. bobby xiang7 July, 2013 at 6:51 pm

    this is good stuff!

  8. Eric William25 June, 2013 at 11:50 pm

    The Lam and his boys are making much more sense than the physicists.

  9. heeheemanofHK20 June, 2013 at 12:52 am

    The onus is on the physicists to explain it clearly to the Dalai Lama in simple terms. He seemed to think it’s on the Dalai Lama to go figure it out the “double slit experiment” in a minute and give an explanation to it which NONE OF ALL THE PHYSICISTS IN THE WORLD has been able to explain in all these years of calculating and theorizing shit.

  10. Vasco Ferreira4 April, 2013 at 4:40 am

    Uau that was a waste of time…

  11. Steve Bart19 March, 2013 at 11:28 pm

    I’m creating a wave by writing about surfing over lava reef as water throws out over my body, wind, spray and air movement effect my two eyes and the wave tests my bravery and balance. In between the waves and the photons exists emotional energy that connects with the peeling rhythm of water your now thinking about. I’ve imagined it, I can fly in a world of compassion. Inspirational energy on a consistent basis driving self consistent interpretation to new conceptually distinct reality. Fun.

  12. Tabula Rasa14 March, 2013 at 4:29 am

    They should have just asked why observation changes the behaviour of the atom to begin with.

  13. Arno Meijnen27 February, 2013 at 8:33 pm

    Yes the wave/particle behaviour of really small particles like photons. I had the ‘how’ explained in highschool with easy to understand experiments. I only later realised it was the basics of quantum mechanics.

  14. oerjkjgj16 February, 2013 at 10:42 pm

    wait, you had quantum physics in highschool?

  15. ji jiang16 February, 2013 at 3:00 am

    nothing is really independent

  16. Handbanana9877 February, 2013 at 2:08 am

    Holy shit! Walter White in the audience at 6:07!
    

  17. Arno Meijnen2 February, 2013 at 5:08 am

    I agree. I had this explained to me in high school ALOT more understandable. It’s kind of frustrating to see how the physicists explain this. Even a simple blackboard would do wonders in explaining the basic principles of how waves and particles behave. Then he could say that quantum particles like photons behave like waves when they are particles. Which is essentially the ‘problem’ he is trying to explain.

  18. Manish Ishwar21 January, 2013 at 6:49 pm

    This is no mistry in patterns.. it’s the space that is passing through 2 slits which creates pattern and light just follows that path and then you see the pattern.

  19. Edward DiBello17 January, 2013 at 5:59 am

    The are two eternal truths… To act or be acted upon.

  20. Edward DiBello17 January, 2013 at 5:54 am

    Each individual light particle and/or wave has a choice; there is intelligence in a single light particle. What seems like a random act by the light particle is in reality light particles making choices with the space that it is limited to, until the entire pattern is fulfilled.

  21. Peter Tytler15 January, 2013 at 11:11 pm

    If we assume that there is universal pulse ( universal constant) with an ossicillation of a certain constant then as at each cycle of that vibratory state high and low frequency modulation it would impact on the ultimate pattern detected on the destination plate regardless by becoming a predictable third party intervenor property of phenomonolgical existance. JUst a thought.

  22. lama03810 January, 2013 at 7:28 pm

    I think the interference phenomenon of either the wave OR photons gives a similar pattern is becoz they’ve been channeled through same conditioned state or filtered through identical slit in either indv. photon experiment or randomly thrown photons. Just as in Buddhism,the condition built in mind through meditation, channels all our random thoughts into a more organized and enlightened pattern of universal understanding which may be purely independent to the observer but in concept is the same.

  23. EmDubification28 December, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    THANK YOU!
    I was waiting to see what was going to happen. Now that I have observed it, I understand.

Leave a Reply