Lecture 1 | Quantum Entanglements, Part 1 (Stanford)

Category : Randomness
Lecture 1 | Quantum Entanglements, Part 1 (Stanford)by wpjljron.Lecture 1 | Quantum Entanglements, Part 1 (Stanford)Lecture 1 of Leonard Susskind’s course concentrating on Quantum Entanglements (Part 1, Fall 2006). Recorded September 25, 2006 at Stanford University. This S…

Lecture 1 of Leonard Susskind’s course concentrating on Quantum Entanglements (Part 1, Fall 2006). Recorded September 25, 2006 at Stanford University. This S…


Related Posts

25 Responses

  1. mick dundee6 July, 2013 at 6:36 pm

    just drink the coffee god dammit

  2. Graham676226 June, 2013 at 12:17 pm

    Youtube is just a list of people’s opinions. I just expressed mine. I am shocked at the hate and responses I have received. I do admit it is a good thing they post the lectures.

  3. relaxedmonk26 June, 2013 at 1:27 am

    Which is that, the ‘youtube armchair faggot’ part? Well thats ironic isn’t it? You are just pissed you had to pay for your education, I bet? That we can freely watch this due to the generosity of Stanford (Dr. Susskind)? Or you could just be some insipid grumpy fellow who likes to stratify and make ignorant statements in the comment section on youtube while making some inane inference. I hope He has mercy on your soul, pray to the resplendence of the lord of the Pumpkins and kneel at his grace.

  4. Graham676226 June, 2013 at 12:46 am

    you’ve proved my point completely

  5. Estelle Asmodelle25 June, 2013 at 3:17 am

    Always good  – Susskind is funny as well as smart.

  6. numoru23 June, 2013 at 2:29 am

    Discovering time waves we will find the answer to a unified field.

  7. numoru23 June, 2013 at 2:23 am

    Think of it like a computer. Higher being controls keyboard and mouse( Forces) that send signals through wire (time particles/entanglement fabric) into components (particles,waves), which use more “wire” to communicate with each other. The ending result is what ever the higher being intended (us being his intentions.)These components can operate by different means separately and even as a whole (quantum mechanics), then the program (our “reality”) operates (regular physics)…

  8. numoru23 June, 2013 at 2:17 am

    If this particle was discovered it would reveal that there is intelligent being behind this “reality”.Also that particles and waves have some sort of intelligence/sense to “listen” to the forces. In this case the intelligent being controls the forces and use the connection of time to enforce these forces onto particles and atoms.

  9. numoru23 June, 2013 at 2:16 am

    Thought about something. If this particle was real it would have to be faster then light.irrational. But what if this particle wasn’t, a particle…what if it was a connection. The connection between entangled particles and non-entangled particles. The particle connection would act as a universal “mail-person” who takes short cuts (through space), It relays universal command codes to particles that tell them what to do, where to go,even how to react to forces and particles around them…

  10. numoru23 June, 2013 at 2:09 am

    Quick Idea..What force causes time.Time should be included as a force, or at least have a particle/wave. It pushes entropy of the entire universe (keeps it going in a single “direction”). It is also a common variable in many equations like the other forces. This could also help enforce the entanglement of time and space(gravity). Gravitons and time particles/waves could be closely related and effect one another….remember just an idea.

  11. relaxedmonk12 June, 2013 at 6:06 am

    I’d love to see things from your point of view, but I just can’t seem to get my head that far up my ass.

  12. chrisofnottingham7 June, 2013 at 1:53 pm

    Ever notice how matrices suck all the fun out of anything?

  13. Muggs McGinnis28 May, 2013 at 3:53 pm

    Susskind’s lectures are excellent. My two wishes/suggestions would be that the questions be presented as subtitles and that the camera be positioned WRT the lighting so that what he writes on the whiteboard is not lost in glare. He’s a brilliant man and an excellent teacher… these lectures are an invaluable gift to the world.

  14. SuperSquark15 May, 2013 at 11:42 pm

    I got to 1hr 12mins and I think I’m moving in SPACETIME already!!!
    Am I way off?

  15. sqwearlinator14 May, 2013 at 9:30 am

    This is way to simplistic, sheesh!

  16. Capt777harris12 May, 2013 at 8:49 pm


  17. Eoghan Griffin12 May, 2013 at 5:27 pm

    He’s teaching older people here, not undergrads. This is part of his life-long learning series.

  18. MichaelShi85 May, 2013 at 11:15 pm

    “D-” I instantly like this professor.

  19. Capt777harris3 May, 2013 at 8:08 am

    I’m a little surprised they teach linear algebra in Quantum physics at Stanford. He did say it was fundamental mathematics, but it seems to have taken up a large part of the lecture.

  20. xsixstring71 May, 2013 at 4:00 pm

    Reminds me of Christopher Walken

  21. Brian Setzer17 April, 2013 at 1:38 am

    Stanford university need some credits for this too, a large portion of it.

  22. Angela Stevens1 April, 2013 at 5:47 pm

    This is great that close to 400,000 views. Still hard to believe that if this many people assume to well understand classical physics, but do not look closely at evidence of motion of WTC building demolitions. AE911truth. 911speakout

  23. mike manu21 March, 2013 at 11:34 am

    i gona pretend im smart and know wtf hes talking about

  24. seloc7120 March, 2013 at 6:30 pm

    be nice to hear the questions

  25. createthiscom14 March, 2013 at 10:28 pm

    I only fell asleep three times. And he never once talked about anything quantum. Ugh.

Leave a Reply